744 - Misconduct in Science

In the late 1980s misconduct in science became a national public issue with several sensational allegations of conflict of interest. The public outcry reached such a point that in 1991 Representative John Dingell of Michigan held hearings on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Science Integrity's handling of several cases. Allegations were made that neither the NIH nor research institutions were following due process, confidentiality, fairness, and objectivity in misconduct cases. Until that time, only the NIH and the National Science Foundation (NSF) had published policies on institutional responsibilities with respect to allegations of conflicts of interest.… Read More

Oops! Subscribers must be logged in to access this content.

Not A Grants Compliance Expert Subscriber?

Unlock access to the benefits below with a no-cost, risk-free trial.

Start Your Free Trial

By signing up for a tour of the Grants Compliance Expert, you are also registering to receive email offers and product updates from us. Simply click unsubscribe at the bottom of any email if you would like to discontinue delivery.

Did You Know ?

You may be able to charge the cost of your Thompson Grants subscription to your federal grant(s). For state agencies and other nonfederal entities, under the cost principles of the uniform guidance, there are allowable items of cost for subscriptions (§200.454(b)) and professional development (§200.473). Please check with your program director, finance officer or granting agency to ensure there is no restriction in the approved grant budget or the award documents.

744 - Misconduct in Science

Oops! Subscribers must be logged in to access this content.

Not A Grants Compliance Expert Subscriber?

Unlock access to the benefits below with a no-cost, risk-free trial.

Start Your Free Trial

Did You Know ?

THOMPSON GRANTS

COMPLIANCE

TRAINING

RESOURCES

HELP

CONTACT