Category: Beginner-level

Thompson Grants Lifecycle Support & Training

It is essential for federal grant managers to have a deep understanding of the grant lifecycle because it enables them to effectively manage every stage of the process, from grant application to closeout.

In federal grant management, the pre-award stage refers to the period before a grant is awarded. During this stage, potential grant applicants research grant opportunities, develop their grant proposal and submit their application to the funding agency. Thompson’s Federal Grants Development module is designed to help grant professionals find sources for federal funding, develop competitive proposals, and take the steps needed to comply with federal grant rules.

The post-award stage refers to the period after a grant is awarded. During this stage, grantees execute their program or project, manage the grant’s budget, and comply with all regulations and reporting requirements outlined in the Office of Management and Budget’s uniform guidance. Many grant professionals believe the post-award stage requires the most significant investment in staff training and development. This includes training on budget management, reporting requirements, compliance monitoring, and audit preparation. The Thompson Grants’ Federal Grants Management Module is designed to help your organization manage its grant awards, ensure they meet regulatory requirements, and manage their grants effectively.

For those seeking federal grants, it’s crucial to understand the grant lifecycle from start to finish. Luckily, Thompson Grants has been a trusted resource in grant compliance since 1972. With products and services covering the entire grants lifecycle, from pre-award planning to post-award management, we can help you navigate the tricky waters of federal grants. Understanding each process step and the requirements outlined in the uniform guidance is crucial to successful grant applications. Don’t let the complexity of the grants process keep you from securing funding — trust in Thompson Grants to help you succeed.


Please note: This blog post is not official or legal guidance. Recipients should consult the federal awarding agency regarding whether the Uniform Guidance applies to a particular federal award. Subrecipients should consult with the pass-through entity. Thompson Grants is not a grantmaking organization and does not award grants.

Unpacking and Understanding Indirect Costs for Grants: A Comprehensive Guide


If you’re a grant manager, financial manager or program manager, you must understand the complexities of developing a negotiated indirect cost rate for your grant program and how indirect costs can impact your budgeting decisions. It’s easy to overlook them – they don’t always appear in an entity’s balance sheet – but understanding these hidden expenses is key to accurately forecasting funding needs. This comprehensive guide provides an overview of indirect costs. It sheds light on successful management strategies when applying for and administering grants so entities can remain efficient and productive.

What are indirect costs?

Indirect or facilities and administrative (F&A) costs help multiple projects and always go towards general overhead and operating expenses. Some indirect costs include utilities, human resources, and other services. 

Determining indirect costs is an essential element to consider when drafting grant proposals. Doing so helps protect the financial sustainability and integrity of the entity. It also helps secure adequate funding to cover all operational costs associated with the implementation of the project. Entities need to account for these costs to ensure they accurately estimate the project’s actual cost because not doing so can lead to budget shortfalls, financial strain, and potential compromise on the quality or scope of a project. Therefore, a thorough understanding and accurate representation of indirect costs in grant proposals are fundamental to any project or organization’s success and financial health.

Estimating and projecting indirect costs

Sometimes indirect costs are referred to as overhead. Estimating these costs involves identifying all the indirect expenses incurred by the entity and allocating them based on specific criteria, such as the proportion of direct labor hours or direct costs. Projecting indirect costs, on the other hand, is crucial for future planning and budgeting. This involves predicting how these costs might change due to inflation, business operations changes or, market environment shifts. It’s an essential part of financial forecasting, helping businesses prepare for potential overhead increases and allowing them to make strategic decisions to manage these costs effectively.

A critical procedure involving indirect costs is collaborating on a negotiated indirect cost rate agreement (NICRA), a rate established between the federal government and a nonfederal entity. This rate is usually expressed as a percentage of the direct costs. Remember that some items might be exempt from these costs, so exclude those from your base amount when calculating.

It is important to understand that each federal agency may have its guidelines and requirements for managing and calculating indirect costs, so always refer to the agency’s specific grant guidance or consult the awarding agency.

Read more about Indirect Cost rates.

Assessing the different types of indirect cost categories

In federal grants management, indirect costs are typically classified within two broad categories:

  1. Facilities: This category includes expenses for maintaining and operating the physical space where the grant-funded work is performed. It might include costs for utilities, depreciation on buildings and equipment, operations and maintenance expenses, library expenses, and more.
  1. Administration: This category covers the administrative expenses supporting the organization’s overall operation but not directly tied to a specific project. These may include general administration and general expenses such as the salaries and expenses of executive officers, personnel administration, and accounting, among others.

Some entities also separate their costs into three basic categories: (i) General administration and general expenses, (ii) Fundraising, and (iii) Membership development.

Remember, each federal agency may have guidelines and requirements for managing and calculating indirect costs, so always refer to the specific grant guidance or consult the granting agency.

Defining and calculating allowable expenses

In grants management, allowable expenses are those costs eligible under a federal award according to the regulations outlined by the awarding agency. The U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provides general guidance for determining allowable costs in the uniform guidance (§200.403).

To be considered allowable, a cost must meet several criteria. It must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award, allocable to the project, and conform to any limitations or exclusions outlined in the federal laws or the grant agreement. It also needs to be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to federally financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity and be accorded consistent treatment.

The calculation of allowable expenses depends on the specific cost principles provided by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). For example, direct costs such as salaries of employees who work on the grant-supported project, supplies and materials used for the project, and travel expenses incurred for the project are generally allowable. Indirect costs, like administrative expenses, are often calculated as a negotiated percentage of the direct costs.

Maintaining proper documentation of all costs is important in the case of audits. Any costs that do not meet the criteria or are not correctly documented may be disallowed and must be covered by the grantee organization.

Identifying potential sources of funding for indirect costs

Identifying potential sources of funding for indirect costs in federal grants management involves a few key steps:

  1. Understanding the Grant Guidelines: Each federal grant will have specific guidelines about what it covers, including whether it provides funds for indirect costs. Always carefully review the grant solicitation and award documentation to understand the funding provisions.
  1. Applying for an Indirect Cost Rate: Many federal agencies allow grantees to collaborate on the NICRA. Once you have an approved NICRA, you can use that rate for indirect costs in your budget proposals for federal grants.
  1. Exploring Other Federal Grants: Some federal grants, found at Grants.gov, specifically cover overhead or administrative costs.

Remember, it’s essential to ensure applying federal funding to cover indirect costs should comply with federal regulations and specific grant guidelines. Consult a grants management professional or the granting agency if you need more clarification.

Are you looking for grant opportunities? Check out GrantScape –  The most comprehensive resource of grants opportunities — From Foundations to Federal, State and, Local Governments

How to properly report and document your indirect cost activities

Proper reporting and documentation of indirect cost activities in federal grant management are critical to ensure compliance with grant requirements and for audit purposes. Here are some steps to guide you through the process:

  1. Establish Clear Accounting Procedures: Your organization should have established accounting procedures that define how indirect costs are categorized and tracked. This includes defining what expenses are considered indirect costs and how they are allocated among various projects or grants.
  1. Maintain Detailed Records: Keep detailed records of all expenses, including receipts, invoices, and payroll records. This documentation clearly shows how each cost is associated with a specific grant and how it contributes to achieving its objectives.
  1. Use a Consistent Method for Allocating Indirect Costs: Apply a consistent method for allocating indirect costs to different projects or grants. This could be based on direct labor hours, direct costs, or another equitable distribution measure. This method should be documented and used consistently across all grants.
  1. Prepare Financial Reports: Regularly prepare financial reports detailing each federal grant’s direct and indirect costs. These reports should align with the accounting records and be prepared according to the grant’s reporting schedule.
  1. Review and Audit: Review your indirect cost calculations and allocations to ensure accuracy and compliance with grant requirements. Auditing your financial statements by an independent auditor is also a good idea.
  1. Retain Records: Federal grants often require records to be retained for several years after the grant period ends. Be sure you understand these requirements and have a system for retaining and accessing these records.
  1. Avoid “Double-dipping.” Ensure that your costs are defined as direct or indirect, and develop internal controls to prevent charging costs as both direct and indirect.

Remember, each federal agency might have specific requirements for reporting and documenting indirect costs, so always refer to the specific grant guidance or consult the granting agency.

Understanding how to calculate and report indirect costs can be challenging for entities applying for grant funding. However, with the right tools and resources, it is possible to properly research potential funding sources for indirect cost activities, establish accurate estimates and projections for such costs, and identify the specific types of allowable expenses included in each category. Knowing how to craft a precise grant proposal that includes these considerations is vital in securing the financial resources needed to ensure your organization meets its goals. If you are still confused about how this may all work together or need further guidance on understanding indirect costs – fear not! We at Thompson Grants offer detailed training courses with comprehensive instruction on evaluating indirect costs and other related components of successful applications. Check out our next workshop on indirect cost to ensure that your grant proposal includes all essential elements required by funder regulations today!


Please note: This blog post is not official or legal guidance. Recipients should consult the federal awarding agency regarding whether the Uniform Guidance applies to a particular federal award. Subrecipients should consult with the pass-through entity. Thompson Grants is not a grantmaking organization and does not award grants.

Preserving Trust and Accountability: The Importance of Grants Integrity for Every Grants Professional

Integrity is the foundation of any successful organization, especially in grants management. Grants are a critical source of funding for many nonfederal entities, and taking steps to oversee grants administration effectively is essential to ensuring that funds are used correctly, efficiently, and in compliance with all applicable regulations. When applying for a grant or cooperative agreement, nonfederal entities generally know their applications will be judged on recipient risk and the proposal’s merits. Recipient integrity is just as important when awarding agencies evaluate who will receive an award for financial assistance.

In this blog, we will discuss the importance of maintaining grant integrity and the steps that program managers and grant managers can take to ensure they maintain proper program compliance integrity. Readers should be aware that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is considering potential revisions to the uniform guidance and other guidance within Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations during 2023, which could ultimately affect requirements related to program integrity once this year’s revisions become effective.

Upholding Ethical Standards: The first step in maintaining grant integrity is ensuring that your entity supports ethical standards in all operations. This includes adhering to the highest standards of conduct regarding financial reporting, recordkeeping, and hiring and training personnel. Ethical conduct is essential for maintaining the trust of donors and the public and ensuring that your organization follows all applicable regulations and guidelines.

Complying with Regulations: Grants are subject to a myriad of regulations and policies at the federal, state, and local levels. As a result, program and grant managers must stay current on these regulations and policies and take steps to ensure that their organizations comply with all applicable rules. Failure to comply with regulations can result in losing funding, negative press coverage, and even legal action.

Proper Governance: Organizations like non-profits must have appropriate governance structures to maintain grant integrity. This includes having a board of directors overseeing the organization’s finances, operations, and compliance with regulations. Good governance also requires that entities have a robust system of internal controls in place to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse.

Grant Reporting: Accurate and timely reporting is a crucial component of grants management. Grant managers must ensure that all reporting requirements are met and that all financial and programmatic information is accurate and complete. Failure to meet reporting requirements can result in the loss of funding and can damage an entity’s reputation.

Ongoing Monitoring: Finally, maintaining grant integrity requires constant monitoring of an entity’s operations, finances, and compliance with regulations. This includes conducting regular internal audits and risk assessments and taking corrective action when necessary. By staying vigilant and taking proactive steps to maintain integrity, grant managers can help ensure that their entity uses grant funding for its intended purposes and comply with all applicable regulations.

In conclusion, ensuring grant integrity is crucial for any entity that receives grant funding. Upholding ethical standards, complying with regulations, implementing appropriate governance mechanisms, conducting accurate and timely reporting, and constant monitoring are all vital elements of maintaining grant integrity. To help grant managers maintain compliance and stay aware of the latest grant developments, visit thompsongrants.com to access our resources. Thompson Grants offers valuable tools and information to help organizations manage grants confidently and successfully. Explore our resources now and take your grant management to new heights!


Please note: This blog post is not official or legal guidance. Recipients should consult the federal awarding agency regarding whether the Uniform Guidance applies to a particular federal award. Subrecipients should consult with the pass-through entity. Thompson Grants is not a grantmaking organization and does not award grants.

Grants Management Made Easy: Understanding the Most Common Acronyms in the Grants World

Are you a new grants professional taking on the complex world of grants management? You may have encountered dozens of acronyms related to grants, but you may not know what they stand for. With such a wide variety of abbreviations used throughout federal financial assistance programs, it is essential to understand them to keep up with industry trends and regulations. Review some of the most important acronyms all federal grant professionals should know.

Common Acronyms

CAS – Cost Accounting Standards: The federal government promulgated 19 standards and rules to determine costs on negotiated procurements. CAS differs from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which applies substantially to all contractors, whereas CAS applies primarily to the larger ones.

CFR – Code of Federal Regulations: The codification of federal agencies’ general and permanent regulations promulgated. The CFR is divided into 50 titles representing broad areas subject to federal law. Title 2 of the CFR contains guidance for federal grants and agreements, including the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR Part 200.

F&A – Facilities and Administrative Costs: These are costs incurred by a grantee for common or joint objectives that cannot be explicitly identified with a particular project or program. These are also known as “indirect costs” or “overhead.”

FAC – Federal Audit Clearinghouse: The federal repository for receiving single audit reporting packages of thousands of recipients of federal assistance. It operates and maintains an online database of single audit information submitted by recipients in 1997.

FAR- Federal Acquisition Regulation: The primary regulation about federal contracts to acquire supplies and services with appropriated funds. The FAR also contains standard solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and various agency FAR supplements.

GAAP – Generally Accepted Accounting Principles: A standard of accounting rules, requirements, and practices issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). GAAP sets out to standardize the classifications, assumptions, and procedures used in accounting in industries across the U.S. The purpose is to provide clear, consistent, and comparable information on organizations’ financials. 

GAGAS – Generally Acceptable Government Auditing Standards: Also known as the “Yellow Book,” GAGAS is a guideline for audits created by the Comptroller General within the Government Accountability Office. These standards are the audit regulations followed by all federal and state, and local audit agencies.

GASB – Government Accounting Standards Board: The independent, private-sector organization that establishes accounting and financial reporting standards for state and local governments that follow Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

MTDC – Modified Total Direct Costs: The base for indirect cost rates, including direct salaries and wages, applicable fringe benefits, materials and supplies, services, travel, and up to the first $25,000 of each sub-award. MTDC excludes equipment, capital expenditures, charges for rent, tuition remission, participants’ support costs, and the portion of each sub-award above $25,000. 

SAM – System for Award Management: The federal procurement database. All entities that want to do business with the federal government must be registered on SAM.gov.

SEFA – Schedule of Expenditures for Federal Awards: A financial statement schedule prepared by an auditee’s management, as well as its auditor, that lists an organization’s expenditures of federal assistance for the fiscal year by a federal agency, grant number, and amount. It is a supplemental schedule that an organization is required to prepare its single audit reporting package.

USC – United States Code: The codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the U.S. It is divided by broad subjects into 53 titles and published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives. The U.S. Code was first published in 1926. The next main edition was published in 1934, and subsequent main editions have been published every six years since 1934.

UEI – Unique Entity Identifier: The official name of the new, non-proprietary identifier that replaced the use of a DUNS number for each awarded entity. The UEI is assigned by the System for Award Management (SAM.gov).

NDAA – National Defense Authorization Act: The name for a series of U.S. federal laws specifying the annual budget and expenditures of the U.S. Department of Defense. The U.S. Congress oversees the defense budget primarily through two yearly bills: the National Defense Authorization Act and defense appropriations bills.

In conclusion, a comprehensive understanding of federal grants terminology and their respective acronyms is crucial for anyone involved in grant management or applying for federal funding. These acronyms function as a common language among grant professionals and help improve communication clarity and effectiveness.

Don’t miss an opportunity to elevate your grants management and compliance knowledge. Start your free trial with our Compliance Expert today for 24/7 access to all Thompson Grants’ webinars, an easily searchable repository of government forms and regulations, and GrantScape, the most comprehensive source of grant opportunities. Take the first step towards becoming a grants management expert now!


Additional Resources:

Thompson’s Guide to Grants Terminology

Grant-related Priorities Under The Biden Administration


Please note: This blog post is not official or legal guidance. Recipients should consult the federal awarding agency regarding whether the Uniform Guidance applies to a particular federal award. Subrecipients should consult with the pass-through entity. Thompson Grants is not a grantmaking organization and does not award grants.

What is 2cfr200? An Overview of Uniform Guidance | Thompson Grants

If you have any federal grant experience, you most likely have heard the term “Uniform Guidance. ” But even some experts need help properly understanding the requirements under the guidance. In December 2014, through the Code of Federal Regulations, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) implemented “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, And Audit Requirements for Federal Awards “ (2 C.F.R. Part 200). It was created to streamline and simplify the existing federal grant management process and replace and consolidate eight previously separate sets of federal grant guidance into a comprehensive set of rules. This simplification aims to reduce the administrative burden for recipients and improve consistency and transparency in federal grantmaking. By including reforms such as new procurement standards and clarified cost allocation rules, the Uniform Guidance also promotes effective and efficient use of federal grant funds. Finally, the Uniform Guidance also benefits the public at large through efforts to reduce administrative costs and improve efficiency for the grantor and grantee, ultimately enhancing stewardship of taxpayer dollars. Federal agencies have implemented the Uniform Guidance within their regulations in other sections of Title 2. The Uniform Guidance was revised in August 2020, and OMB plans to make more revisions in 2023. stewardship of taxpayer dollars.

This blog will help you understand the importance of guidance, how to keep your organization compliant, and best practices for staying aware of the ever-changing grants landscape and the Uniform Guidance.

To whom does the Uniform Guidance Apply?

The Uniform Guidance applies to entities that receive and administer federal grant funding, including state and local governments, tribal nations, nonprofit organizations, and higher education institutions. Compliance with the guidance is required to receive and maintain federal grant funding. Grant professionals must understand the rules and requirements, including financial management, procurement, and reporting standards, to ensure continued receipt of federal funding, avoid penalties and legal actions, improve risk management, reduce errors, and enhance reputation and credibility. 

What does the Uniform Guidance cover?

The Uniform Guidance covers several areas related to federal grant management, including:

  • Financial management: The Uniform Guidance outlines rules for managing federal grant funds, including how to budget, account for, and report on grant funds.
  • Procurement: The Uniform Guidance establishes requirements for grant recipients purchasing goods and services with federal grant funds.
  • Administrative requirements: The Uniform Guidance outlines various administrative requirements, including documentation and recordkeeping standards.
  • Cost principles: The Uniform Guidance determines the reasonable and allowable costs when using federal grant funds.
  • Audit requirements: The Uniform Guidance outlines the requirements for ensuring compliance with federal grant regulations, including Single Audit requirements.

How can organizations comply with the Uniform Guidance?

Grants professionals can help their organizations stay compliant with the Uniform Guidance by implementing the following:

  1. Familiarizing their staff with 2 C.F.R. Part 200 by conducting regular training sessions. This ensures your staff understands their roles and responsibilities under their guidance.  This reduces the risk of non-compliance, errors, and any legal repercussions. Many grantmaking agencies and third-party organizations offer training sessions on Uniform Guidance.
  2. OMB requires all nonfederal entities and organizations to have written policies. Your entity should implement internal policies and procedures to reflect the latest Uniform Guidance requirements and promote efficient grant management.
  3. Maintaining detailed records can help grantee entities identify potential compliance issues and errors early, enabling them to proactively address them and reduce risks. A focused effort on maintaining records can also enhance communication and coordination between team members responsible for managing grant activities leading to improved collaboration, reduced documentation duplications, increased accountability, and greater efficiency.
  4. Conduct regular internal audits to verify compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This can enable grantee organizations to take necessary corrective actions proactively, reducing the risk of financial mismanagement and non-compliance.
  5. Work with grantmaking agencies, professional organizations, or third-party consultants when providing additional guidance and support on issues related to the Uniform Guidance. Third-party consultants can offer technical assistance, conduct training or assessments, or even provide a one-stop shop for all the organization’s compliance needs.

How to stay updated with the latest changes to the Uniform Guidance?

Staying current with the Uniform Guidance is imperative but a necessary investment for grant professionals. Grants professionals can stay informed of the ever-changing grant landscape by:

  • Attending webinars or conferences lets you hear from federal grant management experts and earn CPE and GPCI CEU credits as needed. Attend sessions that feature guest speakers or presentations on the Uniform Guidance.
  • Joining groups or networks for grant professionals, such as NGMA, can offer a space to share updates, learn from others and ask questions about the Uniform Guidance.
  • Participating in professional development workshops, technical assistance, and compliance training can provide a wealth of resources to inform you on the latest Uniform Guidance.

In short, the Uniform Guidance is a comprehensive set of standardized guidelines that outlines fiscal management, procurement, and reporting standards. It applies to organizations that receive federal grant funding, and their adherence to these regulations determines their eligibility for additional funding in the future. Understanding and implementing these guidelines is crucial for successfully administering grants and minimizing the risk of penalties or lawsuits. At Thompson Grants, our experts deeply understand these regulations and their impact on federally funded organizations. Learn how we can help your organization maintain compliance with the Uniform Guidance.

Please note: This blog post is not official or legal guidance. Recipients should consult the federal awarding agency regarding whether the Uniform Guidance applies to a particular federal award. Subrecipients should consult with the pass-through entity. Thompson Grants is not a grantmaking organization and does not award grants.